When the present becomes the past.

Washington Post on Obama - FINALLY!

As I'’m sure you know, the Washington Post Newspaper has always had a reputation for being extremely liberal, so the fact that their Editor saw fit to print the following article about Obama in their newspaper makes this a truly amazing event and a news story in and of itself. Finally, the truth about our radical President’s agenda is starting to trickle through the ‘protective walls’ built by our liberal media.

Matt Patterson (columnist for the Washington Post, New York Post, San Francisco Examiner)
Government & Society
Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.

How, they will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job? Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered into and through the Ivy League despite unremarkable grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer"; a brief career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid of his attention, so often did he vote "present") ; and finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor"; a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at it all and asking:how on Earth was such a man elected president?

Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberaldom to have hung out with protesters against various American injustices, even if they were a bit extreme, he was given a pass.Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard - because of the color of his skin.

Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense, of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.

Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional devastation and deflated self esteem resulting from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist. Holding someone to a separate standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.

And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements, but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president despite no record at all in the Senate. All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool character. Those people - conservatives included - ought now to be deeply embarrassed.

The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of cliches, and that's when he has his teleprompter in front of him; when the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.

Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth – it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.

And what about his character? Obama is constantly blaming anything and everything else for his troubles. Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess. It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.

But really, what were we to expect? The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small and small-minded man, with neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle his job.
When you understand that, and only when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone otherwise with such a man in the Oval Office.

Go back and read it again!!!...and pass it on!!!

History Reminder on Immigration

If anyone wonders why there is a bias against those who illegally cross our Southern Border, the following pictures should help you see the light.

A Little History Reminder!

Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States , people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.

They had waved goodbye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity. Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan . They were defending the United States of America as one people. When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French American, the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags.
And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet.
KEEP THIS BLOG MOVING. FOR THE WRONG THINGS TO PREVAIL, THE RIGHTFUL MAJORITY NEEDS TO REMAIN COMPLACENT AND QUIET. LET THIS NEVER HAPPEN!
I sincerely hope this blog gets read by millions of people all across the nation

the World's Largest Army

  *AMERICA'S HUNTERS Amazing!*
>
> *The world's largest army...America's hunters! I had never
> thought about this....
> *
> *A blogger added up the deer license sales in just a
> handful of states and arrived at a striking conclusion:
> *
> *There were over 600,000 hunters this season in the state
> of Wisconsin. Allow me to restate that number:*
>
> *Over the last several months**Wisconsin's**hunters became
> the eighth largest army in the world.
> *
> *More men under arms than in**Iran.*
>
> *More than**France**and****Germany****combined.
> **
> **These men deployed to the woods of a single American
> state, Wisconsin, to hunt with firearms, and no one was
> killed.
>
> That number pales in comparison to the 750,000 who hunted
> the woods of****Pennsylvania**and****Michigan's****700,000
> hunters, all of whom have now returned home safely.
>
> Toss in a quarter million hunters in**West Virginia****and
> it literally establishes the****fact that**the hunters of
> those four states alone would comprise the largest****army
> in the world.....And then add in the total number of
> hunters in the other 46 states..It's millions more.
>
> The point?
>
> America will forever be safe from foreign invasion with
> that kind of home-grown firepower.
> *
>
> *Hunting -- it's not just a way to fill the freezer. It's
> a matter of national security.
> *
> ****************************************
> That's why all enemies, foreign and domestic, want to see
> us disarmed.
> *
> *Food for thought when next we consider gun control.
> *
> *Have A Great Day!!
> -------------------------------------
> Overall it's true so if we disregard some assumptions that
> hunters don't possess the same skills as soldiers the
> question would still remain, what army of 2
> million****would want to face 30, 40, 50 million armed
> citizens.
>
> **_Don't ever allow gun control or confiscation of
> guns,_**__**_for the sake of our freedom._*
>

The Arrogance of Authority‏

A DEA officer stopped at a ranch in Texas , and talked with an old rancher.
He told the rancher, "I need to inspect your ranch for illegally grown drugs."

The rancher said, "Okay, but don't go in that field over there.....,"
as he pointed out the location.

The DEA officer verbally exploded saying, " Mister, I have the authority
of the Federal Government with me!"

Reaching into his rear pants pocket, the arrogant officer removed his
badge and proudly displayed it to the rancher.

"See this fucking badge?!
This badge means I am allowed to go wherever I wish.... On any land !!
No questions asked or answers given!!
Have I made myself clear......do you understand ?!!"

The rancher nodded politely, apologized, and went about his chores.

A short time later, the old rancher heard loud screams, looked up,
and saw the DEA officer running for his life, being chased by the
rancher's big Santa Gertrudis bull......

With every step the bull was gaining ground on the officer,
and it seemed likely that he'd sure enough get gored
before he reached safety. The officer was clearly terrified.

The rancher threw down his tools,
ran to the fence and yelled at the top of his lungs.....

(I just love this part....)

"Your badge, show him your fucking BADGE........ ! !"

A thump in the dark

You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door.

half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers.

at least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way.

With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.

You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it.

In the darkness, you make out two shadows.

One holds something that looks like a crowbar.

When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire.

The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. one writhes and screams while

the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.

As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble.

In your country, most guns were outlawed years

before, and the few that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless..

Yours was never registered.

Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died.

They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm.

When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.

"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.

"Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."

The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.

Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys.

Their friends and relatives can't find any unkind word to say about them..

Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times.

But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die."

The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters..

As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media.

The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.

Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win.

The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and

that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects.

After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time.

The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.

A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced,

as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.

When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you..

Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man.

It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges. The judge sentences you to life in prison.

This case really happened.

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed one burglar and wounded a second.

In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term..

How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire ?

It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.

This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license.
The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns..

Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.

Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.

The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.

For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable, or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners.
Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the
few sidearms still owned by private citizens.
During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism.
Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.
Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying,
"We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."
All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences.
Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars.
When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities.

Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by the police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply.

Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed.
Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?
WAKE UP AMERICA;THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

"...It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams

If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know.

You had better wake up, because Obama is doing this very same thing, over here,and he can get it done.

And there are stupid people in congress and on the street
that will go right along with him.

Dear Friends,

I have been elected Chairman for the N.C.T.E.C.T. I am truly honored to accept this position. The N.C.T.E.C.T. Is a cause that has been dear to me for many years. I accept this position to protect my children, your Children, the elderly, the poverty stricken, the middle class and even those with no class.

C.T. is a rapidly spreading disease. Unlike Aids, Cancer and Diabetes, C.T. is an affliction cleary visible to all. Many are unable to refrain from staring and pointing, making snide comments including the ever popular "OMG". We must work together to prevent the spread of C.T. Even celebrities can have this disease. Recently Mariah Carry came out to speak about it.

Beautiful Mariah became inflicted with this terrible disease during a performance in Austria. If it can happen to her it can happen to anyone.

Beauties Queen's are not immune.
Beautiful Miss Nevada...


C.T. is an extremely touchy subject especially amoung women.

Some of you may be wondering what exactly is C.T.

The causes of C.T. are not always obvious. C.T. commonly occurs as a result of wearing tight fitting clothes, such as shorts, hotpants, or swimwear - particularly when the labia majora are hairless.^[Due to a combination of anatomical factors and the snugness of the fabric, the crotch and pudendal cleft may take on a resemblance to the forefoot of a camel.
Some fashion analysts have identified clothing design as a cause, rather than its size. Camel toe may thus be exacerbated by garments with a tight central seam that serves to divide the labia majora.

It is now my mission in life to work hand in hand with my costitchuants to help eliminate this unsightly disease.

Where ever I may see, stumble upon or hear rumblings of C.T. I vow to act quickly, approach the individual and in a calm, well heard voice, say.... THere IS a CURE for C.T. If we all work hard to do this in time we will eliminate C.T. totally.

Thank you for your time,

Sincerely,
Barb
N.C.T.E.C.T. Chairperson

This message brought to you by the National Committee to Eliminate Camel Toe.

Addiction is addiction stupid

I go to the dr's office. He checks me up and down and sometimes inside and out. If there happens to be an issue he will prescribe some sort of something for my cough or cramps or whatever.

When I was preggers with my daughter I actually had an eardrum bust. I went to the E.R. cause that bitch hurt! Actually I went because, well, bleeding from your ears is a scary thing.

As I layed in the bed and checked the Dr. out, ummm sorry, I mean the dr checked me out. (slip?) He wrote me a prescription for some antibiotic or something other for the infection and then said to me: would you like a prescription for the pain? Being my first pregnancy I was a bit over protective and I responded with OMG didn't i tell you I am pregnant???? He laughed and said yeah you mentioned it a few times but I can still give you something. Well I have a pretty good tolerance for pain so I politely declined and told him I could always take Tylenol if I feel I need too.

That was it. I totally put it out of my mind till .... NOW! Or rather till lately. Blame it on the fact that I am now addicted to the TV show Intervention. That and the fact that a couple of years after Stina was born some shall I call them people, yes people, and I use the term loosely, came into my life.

It then came to my attention that this person in particular is so addicted to pain killers and dopey feeling drugs that (Instead of using he or she I will say IT,) It would not only go to several doctors in a couple of states to obtain these pain killers. Yet this person does not or will not admit to having an addiction.

In my opinion, and we all know what that is worth.. nothing, this addiction is no differernt from cocaine, crack, or meth. Just because IT does not go to a house and sit and smoke from a crack pipe all day does not make a difference. These prescription pills are just the same as crack when abused.

The pill popper is a junkie too! I think a junkie is someone who has to have something. HAS to have it! If you think you need that pain killer or pain killers the first thing in the morning then you are just as addicted as the person who stands on a corner waiting to buy Meth at 5 am. Maybe this person should get off its lazy ass walk around a bit and wait to see if there is any pain. Not just assume there will be pain eventually so pop goes the pills.

Now there is NOT a damn thing these dr's can do about it. Especially if they are in different states. It is not a case of the right hand not knowing what the left is doing, it's a case of the addict breaking the law. The meth head might steal from family and friends for a fix but IT is perpatrating a crime too...

I have my addiction too. I know it's not easy to quit. I smoke. I have tried to quit several several times and always end up worse then I was before, feeling like i have to make up for lost time. I should clarify.. for those who don't know me.. I smoke cigarettes nicotine only. I am not judging anyone really. I know everyone has their crosses to carry but it is my blog and I really can write what I want on here. If you think I am talking about you, YOU ARE PARANOID from all the drugs you take lmao.

Tune in later in the week to read about how there is always a bit of truth behind every allagation. I will learn to spell it before then i promise.

Peace!!